[Mark S.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) - adult disabled child's case, young adult claim 3d at 1241

3d at 1241

2) The ALJ erred in relying on highly flawed medical expert testimony that conflicted with well established legal standards pertaining to the evaluation of Social Security disability claims

and Judgment granting Motion to Remand

Testimony of lay witnesses

Treating physician’s opinion (old law) - need for genuine inconsistency

[Mark S.] v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) - adult disabled child's case, young adult claim 3d at 1241[Mark S.] v. Commr of Soc. Sec., No. 8: 22 CV 785 DNF, 2023 WL 5091355 (M. D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2023) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff's Memorandum and Plaintiff's Reply Brief Topics addressed: Adult child's disability benefits Establishing onset Prior claim file RFC failure to include credited opinions RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC interacting with others oung adult claims parents